🔗 Share this article

Worldwide, nations are investing hundreds of billions into what is known as “sovereign AI” – creating national artificial intelligence systems. From the city-state of Singapore to Malaysia and the Swiss Confederation, countries are racing to develop AI that understands regional dialects and local customs.

The International AI Arms Race

This trend is a component of a larger global race led by tech giants from the America and the People's Republic of China. Whereas companies like OpenAI and a social media giant allocate substantial funds, mid-sized nations are additionally taking independent bets in the artificial intelligence domain.

However given such vast sums at stake, is it possible for smaller states attain significant advantages? As stated by an expert from a well-known research institute, “Unless you’re a affluent state or a big firm, it’s quite a burden to create an LLM from scratch.”

Defence Concerns

Many states are unwilling to rely on external AI systems. In India, for example, American-made AI systems have at times fallen short. An illustrative case involved an AI agent deployed to teach students in a remote community – it communicated in the English language with a pronounced US accent that was difficult to follow for regional students.

Then there’s the national security dimension. For the Indian military authorities, relying on particular external AI tools is considered unacceptable. Per an developer commented, It's possible it contains some random training dataset that may state that, oh, a certain region is separate from India … Using that certain AI in a military context is a major risk.”

He further stated, I’ve consulted people who are in security. They wish to use AI, but, disregarding particular tools, they don’t even want to rely on American technologies because details may be transferred abroad, and that is completely unacceptable with them.”

National Initiatives

As a result, several countries are backing national initiatives. A particular such initiative is underway in the Indian market, in which an organization is attempting to build a sovereign LLM with public funding. This effort has committed about a substantial sum to artificial intelligence advancement.

The expert envisions a system that is more compact than top-tier tools from American and Asian tech companies. He states that the nation will have to compensate for the resource shortfall with expertise. Located in India, we lack the luxury of investing massive funds into it,” he says. “How do we compete against say the enormous investments that the US is investing? I think that is where the key skills and the strategic thinking comes in.”

Local Focus

Across Singapore, a state-backed program is supporting language models trained in south-east Asia’s regional languages. These particular tongues – such as Malay, the Thai language, Lao, Bahasa Indonesia, the Khmer language and additional ones – are often underrepresented in Western-developed LLMs.

It is my desire that the people who are creating these independent AI systems were informed of the extent to which and the speed at which the frontier is moving.

A leader engaged in the initiative notes that these systems are designed to supplement more extensive models, rather than substituting them. Platforms such as a popular AI tool and Gemini, he states, often have difficulty with native tongues and local customs – interacting in stilted the Khmer language, as an example, or suggesting pork-based dishes to Malaysian users.

Building native-tongue LLMs enables local governments to code in cultural nuance – and at least be “smart consumers” of a advanced system developed overseas.

He adds, “I’m very careful with the word sovereign. I think what we’re aiming to convey is we wish to be more adequately included and we wish to comprehend the abilities” of AI systems.

Multinational Collaboration

Regarding countries seeking to find their place in an intensifying global market, there’s another possibility: collaborate. Experts associated with a respected university have suggested a public AI company distributed among a alliance of emerging countries.

They refer to the proposal “Airbus for AI”, modeled after Europe’s effective initiative to build a rival to a major aerospace firm in the mid-20th century. This idea would entail the establishment of a state-backed AI entity that would merge the resources of different states’ AI initiatives – for example the United Kingdom, Spain, Canada, Germany, the nation of Japan, the Republic of Singapore, the Republic of Korea, France, the Swiss Confederation and Sweden – to develop a strong competitor to the Western and Eastern major players.

The lead author of a study outlining the proposal notes that the idea has attracted the consideration of AI officials of at least several states so far, along with multiple state AI companies. While it is presently targeting “mid-sized nations”, emerging economies – the nation of Mongolia and Rwanda for example – have also indicated willingness.

He elaborates, In today’s climate, I think it’s just a fact there’s less trust in the promises of the existing American government. Experts are questioning like, is it safe to rely on any of this tech? What if they opt to